Non-Violence and the Second Amendment
Keep 'em coming, Steven, this is great stuff. For housekeeping, please be aware that every time you first come to this web page, there is a video of Audrey Barnes at the very bottom that automatically starts playing. Took me forever to figure out where the sound was coming from.I am going through all of it with a slightly different motive from you. I am searching for possible signs of "dustification" in the witness statements, like Tim Timmerman's comments: "I saw the plane disintegrate and then just blow up into a huge ball of flames" and "the buildings didn't look very damaged initially" and "I think the blessing here might have been that the plane hit... before it hit the building it hit the ground, a lot of energy might have gone that way. That's what it appeared like." And comments by Joel Sucherman's, "ah…immediately there were flames that shot up, higher flames, white smoke and then within seconds, thick black smoke."What's with "disintegrate" and "white smoke" and the plane looking like it hit the ground first, when there are no signs that it even touched the grass? Remember, I am taking the different tact of assuming these witnesses are being truthful about what they saw, even though they may be operatives and even though they may not be in on the secret of what they actually saw.My take on Aziz ElHallan: he may have been uncomfortable because he was asked to lie about finding a piece of the plane, not about seeing a plane in the first place.My take on the commuter plane people: operatives planting the seeds for the "no big Boeing" conspiracy theories and/or just bad witnesses.Isabel James: The video footage during her interview interested me more than what she was saying, as at one point you could clearly see two distinct "clouds" arising from the pentagon, a thick dark black cloud and a thinner greyish cloud.Eyewitness Barbara: Again, the video was much more interesting to me as you first start to see a little puff of white cloud emerging from the Pentagon, and then from the same area comes big billowing white clouds. Is this what happens when large amounts of water are poured onto a fire? Not sure. Didn't see hoses or water being poured onto that part of the building, though. Just keeping an open, inquiring mind here...Omar Campos: Is that "fuming" I see coming up from the roof of the Pentagon on the top left side of the frame during this interview? What the heck is that white swirly stuff coming up every once in a while? Looks like dry ice on Halloween.Don Chauncey: Again the video... is this a normal amount of "smoke" for a plane crash into a building? Maybe.
Nichole--Interesting! I won't mind if I'm un- re- de- pre- non- or inter- just as long as you bring all that sweet bunking home to me.Love, SW
P.S. Thanks for the housekeeping tip. She wasn't supposed to be there. I sent her home.
And I know I'm Sid Vicious, Nichole--it's a mantle thrust upon me. So it's nice to have a little milkmaid backing me up with all that overflowing human kindness. keep it up.
Keep 'em coming, Steven, this is great stuff.
ReplyDeleteFor housekeeping, please be aware that every time you first come to this web page, there is a video of Audrey Barnes at the very bottom that automatically starts playing. Took me forever to figure out where the sound was coming from.
I am going through all of it with a slightly different motive from you. I am searching for possible signs of "dustification" in the witness statements, like Tim Timmerman's comments: "I saw the plane disintegrate and then just blow up into a huge ball of flames" and "the buildings didn't look very damaged initially" and "I think the blessing here might have been that the plane hit... before it hit the building it hit the ground, a lot of energy might have gone that way. That's what it appeared like." And comments by Joel Sucherman's, "ah…immediately there were flames that shot up, higher flames, white smoke and then within seconds, thick black smoke."
What's with "disintegrate" and "white smoke" and the plane looking like it hit the ground first, when there are no signs that it even touched the grass? Remember, I am taking the different tact of assuming these witnesses are being truthful about what they saw, even though they may be operatives and even though they may not be in on the secret of what they actually saw.
My take on Aziz ElHallan: he may have been uncomfortable because he was asked to lie about finding a piece of the plane, not about seeing a plane in the first place.
My take on the commuter plane people: operatives planting the seeds for the "no big Boeing" conspiracy theories and/or just bad witnesses.
Isabel James: The video footage during her interview interested me more than what she was saying, as at one point you could clearly see two distinct "clouds" arising from the pentagon, a thick dark black cloud and a thinner greyish cloud.
Eyewitness Barbara: Again, the video was much more interesting to me as you first start to see a little puff of white cloud emerging from the Pentagon, and then from the same area comes big billowing white clouds. Is this what happens when large amounts of water are poured onto a fire? Not sure. Didn't see hoses or water being poured onto that part of the building, though. Just keeping an open, inquiring mind here...
Omar Campos: Is that "fuming" I see coming up from the roof of the Pentagon on the top left side of the frame during this interview? What the heck is that white swirly stuff coming up every once in a while? Looks like dry ice on Halloween.
Don Chauncey: Again the video... is this a normal amount of "smoke" for a plane crash into a building? Maybe.
Nichole--Interesting! I won't mind if I'm un- re- de- pre- non- or inter- just as long as you bring all that sweet bunking home to me.
ReplyDeleteLove, SW
P.S. Thanks for the housekeeping tip. She wasn't supposed to be there. I sent her home.
ReplyDeleteAnd I know I'm Sid Vicious, Nichole--it's a mantle thrust upon me. So it's nice to have a little milkmaid backing me up with all that overflowing human kindness. keep it up.
ReplyDelete