Pentagon Coverup?

"Critical Thrash" is the web site and message board set up by a certain "steve riskus," the pseudonymous skateboarder and amateur photographer who alleges he took pictures within "one minutes" of the aftermath of an attack on the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. I was an active participant on the board for several months until being banned recently for bad behavior.

Well, all I can say is, they started it. Riskus introduced me to the board himself, initiating a thread on February 9, 2007 that he called "have you guys seen this yet?" This was renamed informally recently by a wonderful character there who calls himself peaceful warrior, as "the big bang thread,"for which I am internally grateful--eternity, like infinity, being the province of some other Stephen.

Much can be salvaged from my P.O.S.H. seat on the shipwreck known as Critical Thrash. This adds to the common knowledge base consisting of the facts, C.T. was registered on September 10, 2001, and the 13 images posted there went online approximately an hour-and-15-minutes after the attack--the "exhaustive" 9-11 Commission report of "9:38am," being a simple splitting of the times given in the various news accounts.

Foremost, from a between-the-lines reading, is Riskus's next-to-nonexistent role participating in his creation--his heart belonging to his true message-board home, a name-changing chameleon venue currently called amateur vandals, whose indexed threads we can view, but never join, where the bicycle-riding, basketball-stoked, and guinea-pig-less Riskus nary mentions his skateboarding past.

One may infer that these skateboarders enjoy linkage with the C.I.A. rather than with say, the FBI, given that anyone who would fail to correct an obvious error like "one minutes," would also have such extensive computer steganography underlying their home-page images.

One of the most intriguing threads pertaining to September 11 has not been publicly discussed--unlike such Riskus gems as i need a new job, moving to chicago, and paging riskus, which have been alluded to, pointed out, gone over, neutralized and blended by certain members of the skeptics/truth community. It is named unambiguously: Pentagon coverup?

It was started on December 16, 2004 by a certain ocnsky, who I think is a thirty-something with a brachial-plexus injury, named Rob Nelson, who writes elsewhere, with apparent sadness, "Due to my karma, I am a SWM living in Manhattan," although with NYC's gay male contingent, I should think the chick odds would be ten-to-one in his favor. Here, he is responding to the release of a short film "9-11 Pentagon Strike" with the following,

Wobbles posted this on Dec 17th, 2004 at 12:02:12 am Very convinceing. If it was a 757, why wouldn't there be more of a broad range of damage instead of a small hole penetrating that deep. (That sounds real gay)

olliegrind posted this on Dec 17th, 2004 at 01:28:37 am how many 757's have you seen hit a building? I think only one of us here can say more than zero.

by saying, "I hear you , but they had some convincing pictures of other 757 damage? Who knows, it doesn't change much. Was there bodies? Is there written accounts of names, or was this plane empty? They still orchestrated one of the biggest attacks on us soil, while the wet behind the ears frat boy was in puppet training. Now we are fighting a unatainable war while the real perp is still plotting and scheming. My country right or wrong....." questioning which seems almost legitimate.

This was followed by the sort of critical thrash discourse I grew to know and hate so well,

killforjesus: I hearby declair that anyone who thinks the pentagon airplane crash was a scam or a fake is hearby and officialy and forever now and for the rest of time A TOTAL FUCKING RETARD!

krasauskas: i drove by that shit a day or two after and the damage was huge

riskus: i saw the mother fucking plane hit the building you assholes

krasauskas: but you were on LSD and meth at the time so it dont count....for real though that had to be strange seeing that shit happen.

Miserlou: i entered a replacement order for damaged product used by the pentagon...i bet lots of people saw that shit go down...because they were all sitting in traffic when it happened.

Derek Krasuaskas is a star of the skateboarding demimonde and he provides legitimacy to the board, and he must be seen thus as paid, integral to the disinformation effort. Likewise, Olliegrind, a certain Josh, also is a legitimate skateboarder, but he has since, honorably, dropped off the board, although he may still post as "seippinator" on the "amateur vandals" board.

But the real revelation from the thread is the following:

crap posted this on Dec 17th, 2004 at 02:45:35 pm i was driving past it going to rebuid the old ecrw bowl

which was only a Riskus line before, followed by his/her/its inane statement:

crap posted this on Dec 17th, 2004 at 02:46:24 pm the thing is, is that the plane hit the side r the building not seen by all the fucks stuck in traffic. whatever.

Followed by our steve's odd:

riskus posted this on Dec 17th, 2004 at 02:57:40 pm people on rt 27 and 395 would have been able to see it

I don't think I'm quibbling to ask, rather than using the past perfect tense in a conditional sentence, shouldn't riskus have said, "people on Route 27 could see it! I was on Route 27 and I could see it! Crap (who's really an evil-twisted-angry fuck, by the way,) goes on to say

crap posted this on Dec 17th, 2004 at 03:05:57 pm little harder on 395, but if you didnt notice you would have to be dead. maybe those in arlington cemitary didnt see it, because theyre dead.

Which is how disinformation gets planted to take root as fact. Let's rip that weed out, like what followed:

bigair posted this on Dec 17th, 2004 at 03:20:50 pm If they can do the WTC with planes, they can do the Pentagon with a plane. Ask yourself, why would using some kind of special missile, bomb, or commuter jet work better than a 757?

Do we understand now what the motive and intent was for the cataclysmically misguided decision to NOT use a real 757 jet-liner for the attack on the Pentagon? It was because of hubris in thinking they could accomplish multiple agendas tangential to starting World War III, just like demolishing Building Seven of the World Trade Center in New York City was a tangential overreaching, which now threatens to hang them.

bigair closes by reducing the argument to the absurd, their only refuge:

Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, you must now decided whether to reverse the decision for my client Chef. I know he seems guilty, but ladies and gentlemen... (pulling down a diagram of Chewbacca) This is Chewbacca. Now think about that for one moment -- that does not make sense. Why am I talking about Chewbacca when a man's life is on the line? Why? I'll tell you why: I don't know.

It does not make sense. If Chewbacca does not make sense, you must acquit!

(pulling a monkey out of his pocket) Here, look at the monkey. Look at the silly monkey! (one of the juror's heads explodes)

Leaving crab to end the thread:

crap posted this on Dec 17th, 2004 at 03:23:18 pm i love that scene

I hate that scene crap, like I hate you. I want you to hang from a gallows, with all of your FBI, CIA, Republican and Democratic Party honchos, Executive branch, Judicial branch, and state, county and local government officials, anyone who in any way took part in this endeavor. I will fight to achieve the revolution in consciousness that will lead to this change in governance.