Also revealed is the failed original timing for the destruction of Building 7.
CNN 11:07am
Aaron Brown: In New York, Allan Dodds Frank joins us on the phone, in lower Manhattan. Allan
Allan Dodds Frank: Aaron, just a…two or three minutes ago there was yet another collapse or explosion—I am now out of sight. A good Samaritan has taken me in on Duane Street—at a quarter to eleven there was another collapse or explosion following the 10:30 collapse of the second tower, and a firefighter rushed by us estimated that 50 stories went down. Um, the street filled with smoke, it was like a fire…a, like a forest fire roaring down a canyon. Now as I think Patty has said, and others told you, all of Manhattan—all of downtown Manhattan—is covered with thick white ash and building material. The ambulances have been coming now from as far as Long Island. All the rescue workers are being equipped with gas, or face-filter masks, and firefighters have been arriving even by pickup truck. Otherwise the streets now are deserted.
Aaron Brown: Allan, thank you. Allan Dodds Frank.
Twice on September 11th---on CNN at 11:07 in the morning, and then televised on the BBC 30 minutes before the actual collapse at 5:20pm---pre-planted talking points went off before pre-planted explosives did.
Can you believe the ineptness of the bit players who moonlighted the collapse of Building 7 onto the scheduled demolition of the World Trade Center towers?
(Hat tip to shoestring911.)
I think you are completely off-track here. The number of cock-ups, planted witnesses, and otherwise alleged actors showing foreknowledge and scripts in the mass media is like the joke about economists and recessions: 10 of the last 7 were predicted.
ReplyDeleteI respect the overwhelming evidence leads to the conclusion that the govt. story of 9/11 is a lie and cover up.
However, the reference to 50 stories collapsing is consistent with what a 2nd hand witness might say about what happened to WTC
WTF BG??!!
ReplyDelete"at a quarter to eleven there was another collapse or explosion following the 10:30 collapse of the second tower,"
He is clearly speaking to a third event. Since he can't see for himself (THEN WHY THE FUCK IS HE REPORTING???!!!) he is being careful to leave open his characterization of an energetic event, i.e. an explosion or a collapse. The fifty stories is a talking point.
This is distinct from the myriad (suppressed) eye and ear witnesses who report explosions going off, as this represents a POST SECOND TOWER COLLAPSE event!
Frank is a freak. A CNN financial reporter slash inside duper. How's your fucking retirement account doing in consequence my friend?
P.S. I don't get your joke about economists. News can be traced to the click of a mind opening.
ReplyDeleteI'm seeing your point. My only remaining argument would be the question of whether the journalist was duped or he knew he was lying.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the opening, BG. I apologize for my profanity.
ReplyDeleteI, and others, have presented so many arguments of foreknowledge, from the independent and successful operators like James Nachway, to institutional lifers, like those within a system like Gannett, that the collective guilt of the media is established. A collusion between a corrupt government and a corrupt media is the system. Television reporters read corrupt scripts written by other corrupt players.
The difference between duped and lying is the difference between smart and dumb. There is so much guilt to go around.
You prob. are aware of this:
ReplyDeleteAaron Brown (born November 10, 1948) is an American broadcast journalist most recognized for his coverage of the September 11, 2001 attacks, his first day on air at CNN.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Brown
I aggregate 9/11 blog / news entries (including selected entries from this blog) here:
ReplyDeletehttp://friendfeed.com/rooms/9-11-truth
Aaron Brown's first day on the job at CNN was September 11th, 2001? Thanks Bill for pointing me to that. Do you know how many times that appears in the record? Scores and scores.
ReplyDeleteThank you for linking to my blog. You are about the only one.
I still wonder if they are talking about the WTC-- saying the lower 50 stories came down-- AFTER the first. It's a good find, but this is not unequivocally about WTC7.
ReplyDeletesup - both towers was demolshed in only 10 seconds each (9/11 commision), so the claim of "50 stories" destruction must not be referring to the demolition of either WTC2 or WTC1.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete